Tag: 杭州千花网坊

Alexandre Lacazette & Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang refused to sign new contracts with Unai Emery at Arsenal

first_imgAdvertisement Emery was sacked after a dismal start to the season (Picture: Getty)Wolves boss Nuno Espirito Santo and former Juventus manager Massimiliano Allegri have already been sounded out to replace Emery.Leicester City’s Brendan Rodgers and Manchester City assistant coach Mikel Arteta are also options for Arsenal.It is unclear if Arsenal will appoint a new boss in the coming months or if they would prefer to wait until the end of the season to announce a permanent manager.Who should be Unai Emery’s permanent replacement at Arsenal?Freddie Ljungberg0%Mauricio Pochettino0%Mikel Arteta0%Carlo Ancelotti0%Nuno Espirito Santo0%Share your resultsShare your resultsTweet your resultsMORE: Emmanuel Petit names the top three candidates to replace Unai Emery after Arsenal sackingMORE: Stan Kroenke wanted to give Unai Emery more time at Arsenal before sacking Alexandre Lacazette & Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang refused to sign new contracts with Unai Emery at Arsenal Advertisement Arsenal are keen for Lacazette and Aubameyang to pen new deals (Picture: Getty)Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang and Alexandre Lacazette told Arsenal they would not sign new contracts while Unai Emery was still in charge, reports say.The strikers are an integral part of Arsenal’s side and led the scoring charts during Emery’s reign.Arsenal took the decision to sack Emery on Friday following another humiliating defeat, this time at the hands of Eintracht Frankfurt in the Europa League.Pressure was mounting on Emery for several weeks, but the Evening Standard claim matters were made worse when Aubameyang and Lacazette made it clear they would not commit their futures to the club while the Spaniard was in charge.ADVERTISEMENT Emery defends Arsenal team’s performance after Frankfurt lossTo view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Play VideoLoaded: 0%0:00Progress: 0%PlayMuteCurrent Time 0:00/Duration Time 6:03FullscreenEmery defends Arsenal team’s performance after Frankfurt losshttps://metro.co.uk/video/emery-defends-arsenal-teams-performance-frankfurt-loss-2059112/This is a modal window.Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.TextColorWhiteBlackRedGreenBlueYellowMagentaCyanTransparencyOpaqueSemi-TransparentBackgroundColorBlackWhiteRedGreenBlueYellowMagentaCyanTransparencyOpaqueSemi-TransparentTransparentWindowColorBlackWhiteRedGreenBlueYellowMagentaCyanTransparencyTransparentSemi-TransparentOpaqueFont Size50%75%100%125%150%175%200%300%400%Text Edge StyleNoneRaisedDepressedUniformDropshadowFont FamilyProportional Sans-SerifMonospace Sans-SerifProportional SerifMonospace SerifCasualScriptSmall CapsReset restore all settings to the default valuesDoneClose Modal DialogEnd of dialog window.Arsenal have been trying to tie their star strike duo down to new deals for six months, but have so far been unable to convince either player to put pen to paper.AdvertisementAdvertisementLacazette’s deal does not expire until 2022, while Aubameyang has less than two years to run on his current deal.More: FootballRio Ferdinand urges Ole Gunnar Solskjaer to drop Manchester United starChelsea defender Fikayo Tomori reveals why he made U-turn over transfer deadline day moveMikel Arteta rates Thomas Partey’s chances of making his Arsenal debut vs Man CityThe mood at Arsenal has darkened steadily since the start of the season and the squad were often left scratching their heads over Emery’s instructions.Emery struggled to get his point across to his players and the squad were reportedly pleased to have Freddie Ljungberg placed in temporary charge.Ljungberg is not presently in the frame to take permanent charge at Arsenal, with the club hierarchy considering a host of names. Comment Metro Sport ReporterFriday 29 Nov 2019 5:39 pmShare this article via facebookShare this article via twitterShare this article via messengerShare this with Share this article via emailShare this article via flipboardCopy link2.1kShareslast_img read more

Read more…

$575 million settlement reached with Wells Fargo for Hoosiers

first_imgIndianapolis, In. — Attorney General Curtis Hill has reached a $575 million settlement with Wells Fargo Bank to resolve claims that the bank violated state consumer protection laws. As part of a settlement involving all 50 states and the District of Columbia, Indiana will receive $5.2 million.Specifically, the settlement resolves claims that Wells Fargo:opened millions of unauthorized accounts and enrolled customers into online banking services without their knowledge or consent;improperly referred customers for enrollment in third-party renters and life insurance policies;improperly charged auto loan customers for force-placed and unnecessary collateral protection insurance;failed to ensure that customers received refunds of unearned premiums on certain optional auto finance products; andincorrectly charged customers for mortgage rate lock extension fees.“Such grossly unfair and deceptive trade practices as those demonstrated by Wells Fargo must never be allowed to stand,” Attorney General Hill said. “We must continue working tirelessly to hold companies accountable for engaging in blatant misconduct that harms consumers.”As part of the settlement, Wells Fargo will also create a consumer redress review program through which consumers who have not been made whole through other restitution programs already in place can seek review of their inquiry or complaint by a bank escalation team for possible relief.To date, this settlement represents the most significant engagement involving a national bank by state attorneys general acting without a federal law enforcement partner.Wells Fargo has identified more than 3.5 million accounts in which customer accounts were opened, funds were transferred, credit card applications were filed, and debit cards were issued without the customers’ knowledge or consent. The bank has also identified 528,000 online bill-pay enrollments nationwide that may have resulted from improper sales practices at the bank. In addition, Wells Fargo improperly submitted more than 6,500 renters insurance and/or simplified term life insurance policy applications and payments from customer accounts without the customers’ knowledge or consent.The states alleged that Wells Fargo imposed aggressive and unrealistic sales goals on bank employees and implemented an incentive compensation program in which employees could qualify for credit by selling certain products to customers. The states further alleged that the bank’s sales goals and the incentive compensation program created an impetus for employees to engage in improper sales practices in order to satisfy such sales goals and earn financial rewards. Those sales goals became increasingly harder to achieve over time, the states alleged, and employees who failed to meet them faced potential termination and career-hindering criticism from their supervisors.The states also alleged that Wells Fargo improperly purchased automobile insurance policies for more than 2 million auto financing customers and charged them the premiums, interest and fees for it, despite evidence that the customers’ regular insurance policy was in effect, and despite numerous customer complaints about such unnecessary placements. Wells Fargo has agreed to provide remediation of more than $385 million to approximately 850,000 auto finance customers. The remediation will include payments to over 51,000 customers whose cars were repossessed.Additionally, the states alleged that Wells Fargo failed to ensure that customers received proper refunds of unearned portions of optional Guaranteed Asset/Auto Protection (GAP) products sold as part of motor vehicle financing agreements. As a result, the bank has agreed to provide refunds totaling more than $37 million to certain auto finance customers.Finally, the states alleged that Wells Fargo improperly charged residential mortgage loan consumers for rate lock extension fees even when the delay was caused by Wells Fargo, a practice contrary to the bank’s policy. Wells Fargo has identified and contacted affected consumers and has refunded or agreed to refund more than $100 million of such fees.Wells Fargo has previously entered consent orders with federal authorities – including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) – related to its alleged conduct. Wells Fargo has committed to or already provided restitution to consumers in excess of $600 million through its agreements with the OCC and CFPB – as well as through settlement of a related consumer class-action lawsuit – and will pay more than $1 billion in civil penalties to the federal government. Additionally, under an order from the Federal Reserve, the bank is required to strengthen its corporate governance and controls, and is currently restricted from exceeding its total asset size.As part of its settlement with the states, Wells Fargo has agreed to implement within 60 days a program through which consumers who believe they were affected by the bank’s conduct, but fell outside the prior restitution programs, can contact Wells Fargo to be reviewed for potential redress. Wells Fargo will create and maintain a website for consumers to use to access the program and will provide periodic reports to the states about ongoing restitution efforts.More information on the redress review program, including Wells Fargo escalation phone numbers and the Wells Fargo dedicated website address for the program, will be available on or before February 26, 2019.The states’ agreement with Wells Fargo is attached.last_img read more

Read more…