Tag: 爱上海YG

In reversal NSF lifts proposal limits on biologists

first_img Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country By Frankie SchembriNov. 16, 2018 , 1:10 PM In a reversal, the National Science Foundation (NSF) will no longer restrict researchers to only one proposal submission per year to the biology directorate’s three core tracks in which they are listed as a principal investigator (PI) or co-PI.The change, announced yesterday in a statement by the biology directorate’s acting head, Joanne Tornow, will be in place for at least the 2019 fiscal year that began 1 October. It rescinds a policy implemented this past August that was immediately met with strong opposition from the research community. Tornow cited the community response and the relatively low number of proposals submitted to the directorate since August as the motivation behind lifting the restriction.“NSF understood the community’s concerns about the new submission process because we care about the same things,” Tornow said in statement to ScienceInsider. “To ensure we remain good stewards of the merit review process, we will continue to monitor the effects of these changes and adjust as necessary.” Email The submission limit was the latest in a series of changes the Alexandria, Virginia–based agency has made to its grant review system in past few years. According to Tornow, the restrictions were intended to prevent the biology directorate’s review system from being overwhelmed by proposals as they switched to a no-deadline system, to reduce the number of rejected proposals that were later resubmitted without major changes, and to encourage deeper collaborations between scientists.But the August announcement caused many members of biological research community to voice their concerns that the restrictions would discourage collaboration and hinder the careers of young scientists.The reversal is “a huge relief,” says Kenneth Halanych, a zoologist at Auburn University in Alabama. He was one of 70 researchers who signed a letter in September asking the agency to reconsider the new policy. The Ecological Society of America (ESA) in Washington, D.C., and 20 other scientific societies also sent a letter earlier this month to NSF’s director, France Córdova, asking that the proposal limits be rescinded.ESA and its allies “appreciate that the biology directorate leadership listened and quickly responded by removing the PI or co-PI cap on proposal submissions,” says ESA President Laura Huenneke. “The biological and ecological community’s and the biology directorate’s strong history of collaboration and mutual respect made this possible.”The announcement was “fantastic news,” says Heather Eisthen, an integrative biologist at Michigan State University in East Lansing who helped spearhead the letter writing. Eisthen says she’s spent about an hour every day of the week since late August trying to get the policy reversed by calling and emailing NSF representatives, as have many other researchers in the field. “It’s a big credit to Joanne [Tornow] and Alan Tessier [the directorate’s deputy assistant director] that they were willing to have so many phone calls and conversations with us,” Halanych says.Now, Halanych says he and his colleagues will no longer have to choose between focusing on their own proposals or trying to support the work of younger researchers through collaborations. And it should give early career researchers on the tenure track more opportunities to have their “ideas vetted by the review process and valuable feedback on what a good proposal looks like,” says Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman, an assistant professor of urban ecology at the University of Maryland in College Park.Tornow said the directorate is seeking approval from NSF’s Biological Sciences Advisory Committee “to establish a subcommittee to assist in developing the evidence base for any future policy changes that may be needed.” That was welcome news to Eisthen, who believes there was minimal evidence supporting the initial change.center_img Steve Haddock/NSF In reversal, NSF lifts proposal limits on biologists Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Scientists investigate deep-sea comb jellies with funding from the National Science Foundation’s Dimensions of Biodiversity program.last_img read more

Read more…